Browsing by Author "Adhikari, Suman"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Clinical Profile of Patients Undergoing Temporary Transvenous Pacing in a Tertiary Cardiac Care Centre in Nepal(Institute of Medicine, 2020) Sharma, Manju; Jha, Sunil C; Sayami, Arun; Gajurel, Ratna M; Poudel, Chandra M; Khanal, Rajaram; Pathak, Surya R; Thapa, Shovit; Adhikari, Suman; Yadav, VijayABSTRACT Introduction: Temporary transvenous pacemaker insertion is an emergency lifesaving procedure for patients with hemodynamically unstable and life-threatening bradyarrythmias. The aim of this study was to analyze demographics, indications, route of insertion and complications in patients undergoing temporary transvenous pacemaker implantation. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary-care center in Nepal. The hospital records of patients who had undergone temporary transvenous pacemaker implantation between July 2015 and June 2019 were reviewed. Results: A total of 343 patients with mean age of 65.52±16.09 years received temporary transvenous pacing. Out of these 205 (59.8%) were males. Greater proportion of patients were between the age group of 70-80 years (n=76, 22.2%). Hypertension (n=97, 28.3%) was the most common comorbidity noted. The most common indication for temporary pacing was symptomatic complete heart block 165 (59.6%). Total of 288 (84%) patients received permanent pacemakers while 55(16%) had reversible cause so TPI was removed. Right Femoral vein was the most common (99%) venous access site. Among the 343 patients, complications were observed in 29 (8.4%) of cases during and after the temporary transvenous pacemaker insertion. The overall mortality stood low at 2% (n=7). Conclusion: Temporary transvenous pacemaker insertion is required in elderly population presenting with bradyarrythmias and occasionally in acute myocardial infarction presenting with bradyarrythmias as complication. Temporary pacemaker insertion was overall a safe procedure with infrequent serious complications; however, strategies to avoid and alleviate such complications (RV perforation) should be sought and implemented. Keywords: Complete heart block, myocardial infarction, temporary transvenous pacemakerPublication Occluded Coronary Artery among Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients in Department of Cardiology of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study(Nepal Medical Association, 2023) Sharma, Manju; Khanal, Raja Ram; Shah, Sangam; Gajurel, Ratna Mani; Poudel, Chandra Mani; Adhikari, Suman; Yadav, Vijay; Devkota, Surya; Thapa, ShovitAbstract Introduction: Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction is frequently thought to be caused by incomplete blockage of the culprit artery, whereas ST elevation myocardial infarction is frequently thought to be caused by total occlusion of the culprit artery. The objective of the study was to find out the prevalence of occluded coronary arteries among non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients department of cardiology of a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients in a tertiary care centre from 22 June 2020 to 21 June 2021 after taking ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee [Reference number: 4271 (6-11) E2 076/077]. A total of 196 patients were included in the study by simple randomized sampling. Data on the patient’s clinical profile, angiographic findings, and in-hospital complications were recorded. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 126 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients included in the study, the prevalence of occluded coronary artery was 41 (32.54%) (24.36-40.72, 95% Confidence Interval). Conclusions: The prevalence of occluded coronary arteries was similar to the studies done in similar settings.Publication Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Multi-Drug Resistant Uropathogens in a Tertiary Hospital in Nepal: A One-Year Audit(Nepal Medical Association, 2025) Pradhan, Manish Man; Sharma, Sangita; Poudyal, Sujeet; Gnyawali, Diwas; Adhikari, Suman; Chapagain, Suman; Luitel, Bhojraj; Kattel, Hari Prasad; Chalise, Pawan RajAbstract Introduction: Antibiotic resistance, especially multidrug resistance, poses a global public health threat. It complicates the treatment of infections like urinary tract infections, leading to treatment failure, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Empirical antibiotic therapy, guided by local resistance patterns, is crucial for patient outcomes and infection prevention. This study analyzes urine cultures from TU-Teaching Hospital from January to December 2024 to investigate the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of multidrug-resistant uropathogens. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational hospital-based study conducted in a tertiary care center after obtaining the ethical approval from Institutional Review Committee (IRC), (Approval reference: 470 (6-11) E2). All samples tested fromJanuary 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024 the period included in the study. Data were collected from the Electronic health records of the Microbiology department and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 16.0.0 and SPSS 30.0.0 software to determine the urine culture positivity rate, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant uropathogens, and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns with a specific focus on resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics. Results: A total of 25,315 urine samples were collected for urine culture and sensitivity testing during the study period. Significant bacterial growth was seen in 4,557 (18%). Multidrug resistance was seen in 3,448 (75.66%). The most frequently isolated organisms were Escherichia coli 1724 (50%), Klebsiella 154 (17.7%). E. coli, Klebsiella, Enterococcus, Citrobacter, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter showed resistance to Ceftriaxone (74.61–92.20%), Amoxycillin+Clavulanate (67.58–97%), and Nitrofurantoin (52.29–89.55%) across selectively tested isolates. Conclusions: Urine samples demonstrated a high prevalence of multidrug resistance to routinely prescribed antibiotics, even among second-line parenterally administered antibiotics. Only costly third-line antibiotics exhibited low resistance.