Browsing by Author "Dhital, Pawan"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Comparison of Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy in Nepal(Institute of Medicine, 2020) Sigdel, Prem R; Gnyawali, Diwas; Rai, Bipendra D K; Dhital, Pawan; Parajuli, Purushottam; Chudal, Sampanna; Dhakal, Niraj; Pradhan, Manish; Poudyal, Sujeet; Chapagain, Suman; Luitel, Bhoj R; Chalise, Pawan R; Sharma, Uttam K; Gyawali, Prem RABSTRACT Introduction: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is the gold standard for kidney retrieval in live donors. Until recently, donor nephrectomies were performed only by open technique in Nepal. There is no information on the experience and outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in Nepal. The study was done to compare the outcomes among donors undergoing open and laparoscopic nephrectomies, and to compare the graft related outcomes between the two groups receiving these kidneys. Methods: In this retrospective study, 44 kidney donors from March 2019 to October 2019 were analyzed. Donors were divided into 2 groups: open donor nephrectomy (ODN) and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Parameters for analysis included demographic data, warm ischemia time, surgery time and length of hospital stay. Data on early graft function and complications in recipients till 30th post-operative day were compared. Results: There were 22 donors each in the ODN and LDN groups. Baseline characteristics of the donors were comparable between two groups. Mean surgery duration (183.55±43.31 minutes vs 117.73±18.75 minutes) and first warm ischemia time (11.22±4.34 minutes vs 2.3±0.8 minutes) was significantly high in LDN. Hemoglobin drop, post-operative complications in donors, creatinine of donors at discharge, mean hospital stay, graft function at one month and complications in recipients were comparable among ODN and LDN. Pain score in 1st post-operative day was comparable between two groups, however, pain was significantly less in second post-operative day in LDN. Conclusion: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is feasible in Nepal and associated with acceptable morbidity and graft function when compared to ODN. Keywords: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, open donor nephrectomy, renal transplantationPublication Nephron Sparing Surgery for Small Renal Mass at a University Teaching Hospital: A Six Years Retrospective Review(Institute of Medicine, 2019) Rai, Bipendra DK; Poudyal, Sujeet; Dhital, Pawan; Pradhan, Manish; Chapagain, Suman; Luitel, Bhoj R; Chalise, Pawan R; Sharma, Uttam K; Gyawali, Prem RABSTRACT Introduction Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is the standard of care for clinical T1 (cT1), renal mass less than 7 cm, whenever intervention is indicated. It has oncological outcome equivalent to radical nephrectomy in small renal masses and it also minimizes the progression to chronic kidney disease. However, there is paucity of data on outcomes of NSS in Nepalese population. Methods A six years retrospective review of medical records of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy from Jan 2012 to Dec 2017 in Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant Surgery at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital was done to determine its demographics and outcomes. Results Twenty eight patients underwent nephron sparing surgery for clinical T1 renal masses in the past six years. Complications occurred in three cases. Five of the lesions were benign and 23 malignant on final histology. Clear cell carcinoma was the commonest variant of renal cell cancer. Margin was positive in two cases and both were kept in close surveillance. There was no local recurrence and renal impairment during five to 60 months follow-up. Conclusion Nephron sparing surgery is a safe procedure with good oncological outcome for clinical T1 renal mass. It prevents unnecessary nephrectomy in benign lesions as well as chronic renal impairment at the same time. Keywords: Nephron sparing surgery, small renal massPublication Retrospective Review of Adrenalectomy in a Tertiary Center in Nepal(Institute of Medicine, 2019) Dhital, Pawan; Rai, Bipendra DK; Pradhan, Manish; Poudyal, Sujeet; Chapagain, Suman; Luitel, Bhoj R; Chalise, Pawan R; Sharma, Uttam K; Gyawali, Prem RABSTRACT Introduction Adrenal gland surgery is a challenging art as it encompasses diverse physiological derangements which are even life-threatening. Also, it remains a medical finesse to rightly identify the correct patient who will benefit from surgery which include strong biochemical and radiological resource. Soundly performed surgery will lead to oncologic and homeostatic correction leading to near normal course. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of adrenalectomy cohort over three years in a tertiary center in Nepal identifying diagnosis, perioperative management and postoperative course. The objective of this study is to review the presentation, histopathology and clinical outcomes of patients operated for adrenal mass in our center. Results There were 42 surgeries performed via open approach. The number of adenoma, phaeochromocytoma, carcinoma and non-functioning tumor were 13, 16, 12 and one respectively. In most of the hypertensive patients, control was achieved with minimal drug and recurrences were observed in 25% of carcinoma in postoperative follow up. Conclusion A large proportion of operative adrenal mass are observed clinically in our setup. The surgical outcome is satisfactory but judicious perioperative management is essential. Keywords: Adrenalectomy, adrenocortical carcinoma, phaeochromocytoma