Browsing by Author "Shrestha, Sudip"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Cutaneous Reactions Following Anticancer Drug Therapy in a Tertiary Care Centre(Nepal Medical Association, 2024) Thapa, Deeptara Pathak; Shrestha, Sudip; Shrestha, SaloniAbstract Introduction: Cutaneous reactions are dermatological abnormalities that can occur after anticancer drug therapy in cancer patients. Cutaneous reactions can range from mild dermatological disorders to life-threatening medical conditions and may worsen a patient's quality of life. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of cutaneous reactions following anticancer drug therapy in a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer patients following anticancer therapy in the outpatient department of dermatology of a tertiary care centre between 1 October 2021 to 30 December 2022. Convenience sampling was done. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% Confidence Interval. Results: Among 3,288 patients, the prevalence of cutaneous reactions following anticancer drug therapy was seen in 73 (2.22%) cancer patients. The mean age was found to be 49.42±1.45 years. Anagen effluvium was the frequently observed cutaneous reaction (30.10%) followed by palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (19.94%). Conclusions: The prevalence of cutaneous reactions following anticancer drug therapy among cancer patients was found to be lower as compared to the studies conducted in similar settings. An interdisciplinary approach is required to identify cutaneous reactions to anticancer therapy and to navigate change in the treatment plan.Publication Performance of Distress Thermometer: A Study among Cancer Patients(Nepal Health Research Council, 2023) Thapa, Sudip; Sharma, Susmita; Gautam, Nishim; Shrestha, Sudip; Ghimire, Bijesh Raj; Dahal, Sanuja; Adhikari, Bibhav; Maharjan, Rubina; Thapa, Sadiksha; Kattel, Regina; Koirala, RishavAbstract Background: The Distress Thermometer accompanied with Problems List is a commonly used screening tool for psychosocial distress. However, it’s cut-off score, performance and risk factors for psychosocial distress varies among studies. This is the first study conducted in Nepal to investigate the Distress Thermometer’s screening properties, its optimal cut-off score and evaluating the prevalence of psychosocial distress and its risk factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 162 heterogeneous cancer patients. The English form of the Distress Thermometer was translated to Nepali using a forward and backward translation method. Questionnaires including socio-demographic, clinical characteristics, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Distress Thermometer accompanied with Problems List were filled. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis of distress thermometer scores was evaluated against Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Total (?15). An Area Under the Curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated at each Distress Thermometer cut-off score. Results: Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis showed an excellent discriminating performance (Area Under the Curve =87.4%). A cut-off score of 4 on Distress Thermometer was established and it yielded sensitivity (88.9%), specificity (71.1%), positive predictive value (75.4%) and negative predictive value (86.5%) respectively. Furthermore, 55.6% of participants were distressed and emotional problems (odd ratio = 28.00), practical problems (odd ratio = 12.152) and physical problems (odd ratio = 2.397) were found to be significant risk factors for PD. Conclusions: PD is a global burden in cancer patients. The DT with a cut-off score of 4 accompanied with PL is valid instrument for screening PD in Nepali cancer patients. PL identified the problems that causes of PD. Keywords: Cancer; Distress Thermometer; Nepal.