Journal Issue:
No 2, Issue 14, APRIL-JUNE, 2006

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Volume

Number

Issue Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

1812-2027

Journal Volume

Journal Volume
Volume: 4

Articles

Publication
Solid biomass fuel: Indoor air pollution and health effects
(Kathmandu University, 2006) SK, Joshi
NA
Publication
Eye – The window of the human body
(Kathmandu University, 2006) OK, Malla
NA
Publication
Prescribing patterns in the orthopaedics outpatient department in a teaching hospital in Pokhara, western Nepal
(Kathmandu University, 2006) PR, Shankar; R, Pai; AK, Dubey; DK, Upadhyay
Objectives: Information on the utilization patterns of drugs in the orthopaedics outpatient department (OPD) are lacking in hospitals in western Nepal. The present study was carried out to obtain demographic information about the respondents selected for analysis, information on the average number of drugs prescribed and the average cost of drugs per prescription. The prescriptions were critically analyzed using predetermined criteria. Methods: The study was carried out over a four-month period (01.09.2002 to 31.12.2002) at the Manipal Teaching hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. The percentage of encounters with an injection or an antibiotic prescribed was noted. The percentage of drugs prescribed from the Essential drug list of Nepal and the mean cost of drugs per prescription was calculated. Results: 1238 patients attended the orthopaedics OPD during the study period. 186 prescriptions were randomly selected for analysis. The mean number of drugs per prescription was 1.9. Low backache was the most common reason for attending the OPD. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the most commonly prescribed drug group. Diclofenac and meloxicam were the most commonly prescribed drugs. Mean ± SD cost of drugs was 166.2 Nepalese rupees. Injections and antibiotics were prescribed in 16 (8.6%) and 7 (3.8%) encounters respectively. 51 prescriptions (27.4%) had various problems. Absence of diagnosis on the prescriptions and the duration of treatment were most commonly observed. Conclusions: Percentage of prescribing by generic name was low. Educational sessions for the doctors at different levels to encourage prescribing by generic names and on correct writing of prescriptions are required. Studies covering a larger number of patients and for a longer time period are required. A greater number of patients can be studied, seasonal variations can be overcome and drug utilization can be measured quantitatively. Key words: Drug use patterns, Drug utilization studies, NSAIDs, Prescription audit, Tertiary care hospital
Publication
Evaluation of endometrial changes and p53 expression in tamoxifen treated women: Comparison of various methods
(Kathmandu University, 2006) HP, Pokharel; N, Bhatla; A, Kriplani; A, Mukhopadhyay; A, Srivastava; R, Ralhan
Objective: To compare transvaginal sonography (TVS), sonohysterography (SHG), hysteroscopy and endometrial aspiration (EA) and p53 expression in assessing endometrial abnormalities in women on tamoxifen. Methods: In a cross sectional study of 50 pre- and post-menopausal women receiving tamoxifen for > 2 years, all participants underwent TVS and EA. Those with endometrial thickness > 4 mm on TVS underwent hysteroscopy and SHG. Serum p53 antibody and p53 immunohistochemistry were tested in all women. Results: The sensitivity and specificity when compared with histopathology as the reference standard were as follows: TVS 100% and 33.3%, SHG 85.7% and 50%, hysteroscopy 92.8% and 80.8%, serum p53 50% and 83.3%, and p53 immunohistochemistry 57.1% and 61.1%. Prevalence of endometrial abnormalities was not significantly different in asymptomatic and symptomatic women. Conclusion: Tamoxifen-users require routine testing for endometrial evaluation. TVS followed by hysteroscopy and biopsy is an effective option. p53 expression correlates with histological abnormalities. Key words: Tamoxifen, Sonography, Sonohysterography, Hysteroscopy, Endometrium, p53
Publication
An open, randomized, comparative study of efficacy and safety of risperidone and haloperidol in schizophrenia
(Kathmandu University, 2006) SM, Tamrakar,; MK, Nepal; NR, Koirala; VD, Sharma; CK, Gurung; SR, Adhikari
Objectives: In the last decade there have been numerous randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of second generation antipsychotics and conventional antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia, but most of them have been conducted in the western population. This study compared the efficacy and safety of risperidone versus haloperidol in the Nepalese context, in order to add on to the very few literatures available on this topic in the South East Asia region and compare them. Methods: Patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive risperidone 4-6 milligrams (mg) per day and haloperidol 10-20 mg per day, and were followed up for 6 weeks. Assessment were done on the day of the diagnostic interview and days 7, 14, 28 and 42 (end point). During the assessment periods Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was administered to monitor the progress in psychopathology and Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) side effects rating scale was applied to rate the treatment emergent adverse effects. Results: Both risperidone and haloperidol were associated with substantial baseline- to- endpoint reduction in symptom severity. After one week of treatment, the improvement in schizophrenia with risperidone was significantly better than haloperidol in terms of PANSS- total Score (-45.4 versus –29.5), negative subscale score (-14.3 versus -6.68) and general psychopathology subscale score (-20.9 versus –13.7). At the end point of the study, the benefit was maintained in total score (-52.1 versus –43.1), though the negative subscale score still showed tendency for greater improvement in psychopathology with risperidone. The side effects profile did not show significant differences except in extrapyramidal symptoms. Thirty-eight percent of risperidone treated patients had to resort to anti-parkinsonian treatment compared to 78% in haloperidol treatment group. Conclusion: Similar to the studies in the western countries, Asia and Indian subcontinent, both risperidone and haloperidol were effective in the reduction of psychopathological symptoms in this group of Nepalese population with the diagnosis of schizophrenia. However, risperidone was quicker and better then haloperidol and risperidone had a better safety profile. This is important, because extrapyramidal side effects of neuroleptics are responsible for non-compliance and increased cost in terms of us of anti-parkinsonian medication. Key words: schizophrenia, antipsychotic, risperidone, haloperidol, positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS).

Description

Keywords