Browsing by Author "Malla, BR"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Clinico-Pathological Correlation of Colorectal Diseases by Colonoscopy and Biopsy(Kathmandu University, 2017) Makaju, R; Amatya, M; Sharma, S; Dhakal, R; Bhandari, S; Shrestha, S; Gurung, R; Malla, BRABSTRACT Background Colonoscopy is a simple, safe and well tolerated procedure, the visualization of the mucosa of the entire colon and terminal ileum to detect intestinal abnormalities and obtain biopsy leads to the early detection of the pathologic process and institution of appropriate therapy. Objective To find out the correlation between clinical and histopathological diagnosis of colorectal diseases. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Pathology, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital from Jan. 2015 - Jan. 2016. Altogether, 95 colonoscopic biopsies were examined and recorded clinical data using pre-designed pro forma. The specimens were grossed, processed and embedded using standard procedures, stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin stain and were analyzed using light microscope. Special stains Ziehl Neelsen, and Periodic Acid-Schiff were used whenever necessary. Result Analyses of 95 cases of colonoscopic biopsies were done. The most common clinical diagnosis was polyp in 49 cases (51.57%) and the common histopathological diagnosis was non-neoplastic polyps 31(32.63%). There was no correlation in cases for suspected infectious colitis, microscopic colitis and hemorrhoids. Conclusion Colonoscopy is incomplete without biopsy and histopathology is the gold standard for the diagnosis of colorectal lesions. The clinico-pathological correlation for neoplastic lesions was excellent. However, correlation was poor in non-neoplastic lesion. KEY WORDS Colonoscopy, colorectal lesions, histopathologyPublication Comparison of Tzanakis Score vs Alvarado Score in the Effective Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis(Kathmandu University, 2014) Malla, BR; Batajoo, HABSTRACT Background Acute appendicitis is the most frequent surgical emergency encountered worldwide. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of Tzanakis score and Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Tzanakis scoring system with Alvarado scoring system in diagnosing AA. Methods This was a retrospective and nonrandomized observational study conducted in Dhulikhel hospital. It included 200 clinically diagnosed cases of acute appendicitis who underwent emergency open or laparoscopic appendectomy during the year 2012. Final diagnosis of acute appendicitis was based on histological findings given by pathologist. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Tzanakis score was 86.9%, 75.0, 97.5% and 33.3% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Alvarado score was 76.0%, 75.0%, 97.2% and 21.4% respectively. Negative appendectomy was 8.0%. Conclusion Tzanakis scoring system is an effective scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis. KEY WORDS Acute appendicitis, alvarado score, tzanakis scorePublication Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Complication and Conversion Rate(Kathmandu University, 2010) Malla, BR; Shrestha, RKMABSTRACT Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become standard method for treating gallstone. However, different centres have reported different complications and conversion rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate complications and conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy into open cholecystectomy in Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University, Nepal. Methods Files of all patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2005 to December 2009 were reviewed. Out of 119 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases, 102 were included in the study as complete information was lacking in the rest. Results Out of 102 cases, 80 were female. Symptomatic cholelithiasis were 76.47%. The mean hospital stay was 2.48 days. Postoperative complications occured in 5.88% patients. Conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was 3.92%. Conclusions Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a reliable and safe surgery. With growing experience in laparoscopic technique, it is possible to bring complications and conversion rate to minimum. However, there will be no significant improvements once learning curve is reached. Rather, the nature of biliary injury may become more severe. Key Words cholecystectomy, conversion, gallstone, laparascopicPublication The Predictive Value of Pre-Operative Symptoms Including Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Elective Symptomatic Cholecystolithiasis(Kathmandu University, 2013) Karmacharya, A; Malla, BR; Joshi, HN; Gurung, RB; Rajbhandari, MABSTRACT Background It has always been a challenge to distinguish between upper gastrointestinal symptoms due to gall stones or any other causes. The persistence of abdominal symptoms even after cholecystectomy is highly discouraging for surgeons. Objective To evaluate the value of preoperative (UGE) as a routine investigative tool in patients with gall stone disease and to assess the outcome of cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones on preoperative abdominal symptoms. Methods This is a prospective study conducted on 96 cases at the Department of Surgery, Dhulikhel Hospital among ultrasonographically proven gall bladder stones irrespective of age and sex. After the examination, all the patients were subjected to UGE, and biopsy were obtained for histopathology if required. The statistical analysis were performed using spss version 16. Results Out of total patients, 84(87.5%) were females and 12(12.5%) were males with a M: F ratio of 1:7. Both the sexes were comparable in age groups. Out of total 96 patients, 53(55.2%) presented with typical pain and 43(44.8%) presented with atypical pain. All the patients were subjected to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) and 53(55.2%) had normal findings and 43(44.8%) had various lesions. Patients with typical pattern of pain had normal endoscopic findings and those with atypical pain had pathology in upper gastroendoscopy (p<0.001). Serious pathology resulting to change of the planned treatment was found in three cases (3.12%). Among them two had gastric carcinoma and one had active peptic ulcer disease. The relief rate after the cholecystectomy was significant in patients with typical pain than among those with atypical pain (p<0.001). The commenest post cholecystectomy symptoms were heart burn (10%), abdominal discomfort (9%) and dyspepsia (7%). Conclusion Presence of atypical pain in patients with gall stones is highly likely to have other coexisting upper gastrointestinal pathologies. Hence, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy prior to elective cholecystectomy in patients with gall stones can be clinically helpful. KEY WORDS Biliary colic, cholelithiasis, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy