Article:
Maternal and fetal outcome in elective versus emergency cesarean section

creativeworkseries.issnJNMA Print ISSN: 0028-2715; Online ISSN: 1815-672X
dc.contributor.authorSuwal, Anupama
dc.contributor.authorShrivastava, Veena R
dc.contributor.authorGiri, Amrita
dc.creator.affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital, Atterkhel, Kathmandu, Nepal.
dc.creator.affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital, Atterkhel, Kathmandu, Nepal.
dc.creator.affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital, Atterkhel, Kathmandu, Nepal.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-12T06:11:16Z
dc.date.available2026-10-12T06:11:16Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction: The complications of cesarean section are seen more commonly in emergency than in elective cases. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of cesarean section in Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital and to compare the maternal and fetal outcome in elective and emergency cesarean section. Methods: A prospective study of all the cases undergoing cesarean section in Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital was carried out during the period of six months from Asar 2069 to Mangsir 2069. Results: The incidence of cesarean section was 254 (22.30%) out of which emergency cesarean section accounted for 167 (65.7%) and elective cesarean section for 87 (34.3%). The usual indications of emergency cesarean section were fetal distress, previous cesarean section in labour, non progress of labour and prolonged second stage of labour. The usual indications of elective cesarean section were previous cesarean section, breech, cephalopelvic disproportion and cesarean section on demand. There was found to be no significant difference in age, period of gestation, blood loss and blood transfusion in emergency vs. elective cesarean section. There was significant difference seen in the length of hospital stay, fever, urinary tract infection, wound infection and low APGAR in five minutes indicating that these were more common in emergency cesarean section. Significant difference was also seen in the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage indicating that it was seen more in elective cesarean section. Conclusions: The incidence of cesarean section in Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital is high and the overall complication rate is higher in emergency cesarean section than in elective cesarean section. Keywords: Cesarean section; Fetal and maternal outcome.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.2426
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/8097
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNepal Medical Association
dc.subjectCesarean section
dc.subjectFetal and maternal outcome
dc.titleMaternal and fetal outcome in elective versus emergency cesarean section
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage566
oaire.citation.startPage563
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication8d841c1c-a325-4c44-832d-306937ec270c
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8d841c1c-a325-4c44-832d-306937ec270c
relation.isJournalOfPublicatione6e146a0-0ece-4aba-aa0a-6ccfbd10a12a

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
563-566.pdf
Size:
70.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections