Publication: Permcath - A Vascular Access for Hemodialysis, Our Experience in Last Two Years
| creativeworkseries.issn | 1812-2027 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Baidya, PR | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shrestha, K | |
| dc.contributor.author | Deuja, ML | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rai, A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shrestha, N | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shrestha, A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Baidya, A | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-02T06:16:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-02T06:16:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description | Baidya PR,1 Shrestha K,2 Deuja ML,3 Rai A,3 Shrestha N,3 Shrestha A,4 Baidya A5 1Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2Department of Nephrology, 3Department of Anesthesia, Sahid Dharma Bhakta National Transplant Center, Bhaktapur, Nepal. 4Department of Anesthesia, Nidan Hospital, Pulchowk, Nepal. 5Intern, Nepal Medical College Jorpati, Kathmandu. | |
| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT Background The double lumen tunneled catheter (Permcath) is mostly used as an alternative access, not as a temporary access in End Stage Renal Disease patients requiring hemodialysis. If there is no possibility of other access modalities, failed or unable to create native arteriovenous fistula (AVF), Permcath can be a very good alternative. Objective To find the indications, complications and results of Permcath insertion. Method We reviewed the results of 92 Permcath inserted under ultrasound guidance in two different hospitals, 45 in Sahid Dharma Bhakta National Transplant Center (SDNTC), Bhaktapur and 47 in Nidan Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Lalitpur from April 2016 to April 2018 retrospectively. Result We had inserted 55 Permcath (59.78%) in right internal jugular vein (IJV), 25 (27.17%) in left internal jugular vein and 12(13.04%) in femoral vein. In terms of major complications, two (2.17%) patients had profound hypotension, bradycardia and cardiac arrest due to left internal jugular vein tear. Three patients (3.26%) died within a week due to septicemia and 23 patients (25%) died with multiple causes within one year. Of the cases, till now in 39 cases (42.39%) Permcath has been removed. Major reasons of removal of Permcath are post renal transplant in 18 cases (19.57%), Arterio Venous Fistula maturation in 13 cases (14.13%), Infection in six patients (6.52%) and non functioning Permcath in two patients (2.17%). Conclusion Permcath remains a reliable method for short term vascular access, hence can be used as a bridge to renal transplant or arteriovenous fistula maturation. KEY WORDS Permcath, Tunneled dialysis catheter, Vascular access | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/3358 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Kathmandu University | |
| dc.subject | Permcath | |
| dc.subject | Tunneled dialysis catheter | |
| dc.subject | Vascular access | |
| dc.title | Permcath - A Vascular Access for Hemodialysis, Our Experience in Last Two Years | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.article.type | Original Article | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 266 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 263 | |
| relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication | fba8ff84-c441-4618-8dc1-db69abb9ff05 | |
| relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | fba8ff84-c441-4618-8dc1-db69abb9ff05 | |
| relation.isJournalOfPublication | a782b7ff-cf89-4178-ad1c-11ed89cfe1bd |