Publication:
Peripartum Hysterectomy among Patients Admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

creativeworkseries.issnJNMA Print ISSN: 0028-2715; Online ISSN: 1815-672X
dc.contributor.authorLama, Sushma
dc.contributor.authorTodi, Sushila
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Reena
dc.contributor.authorAcharya, Swikrity
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-24T06:32:14Z
dc.date.available2025-09-24T06:32:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionSushma Lama Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Patan Academy Of Health Sciences, Lagankhel, Kathmandu, Nepal Sushila Todi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Patan Academy Of Health Sciences, Lagankhel, Kathmandu, Nepal Reena Shrestha Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Patan Academy Of Health Sciences, Lagankhel, Kathmandu, Nepal Swikrity Acharya Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Patan Academy Of Health Sciences, Lagankhel, Kathmandu, Nepal
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy is a life-saving procedure performed as an emergency procedure to control torrential bleeding and it is associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. There are only a few studies regarding this topic so this study guides us to monitor the trend and start appropriate policies to reduce unnecessary caesarean deliveries. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy among patients admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the tertiary care centre. Data from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2022 were collected between 25 January 2023 and 28 February 2023 from the hospital records. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of the same institute (Reference number: 2301241700). Convenience sampling was done. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 54,045 deliveries, peripartum hysterectomy was seen in 40 (0.074%) (0.05-0.10, 95% Confidence Interval). The major indication of emergency peripartum hysterectomy was abnormal placentation (placenta accreta spectrum) which was 25 (62.50%) followed by uterine atony in 13 (32.50%) of patients and uterine rupture in 2 (5%). Conclusions: The prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy was lower than in other studies done in similar settings. The indication for Emergency peripartum hysterectomy has changed in recent years from uterine atonicity to the morbidly adherent placenta which is due to a rise in the caesarean section rate.
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.8162
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/2323
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNepal Medical Association
dc.subjectCaesarean section
dc.subjectHysterectomy
dc.subjectPlacenta accreta
dc.titlePeripartum Hysterectomy among Patients Admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage403
oaire.citation.startPage400
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication4868a5d2-9d9a-41c1-8965-99b78270b87b
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4868a5d2-9d9a-41c1-8965-99b78270b87b
relation.isJournalOfPublicatione6e146a0-0ece-4aba-aa0a-6ccfbd10a12a

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
400-403.pdf
Size:
239.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections