Publication:
Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Parameters and Bishop Score as Predictors of Successful Induction of Labor in Term High-Risk Pregnancy

creativeworkseries.issn1812-2027
dc.contributor.authorShakya, S
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, A
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-09T06:57:42Z
dc.date.available2026-01-09T06:57:42Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionShakya S, Shrestha A Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Background Induction is one of the most common interventions in obstetrics practice, accounting for 1.4-35%. Cervical favorability is crucial for successful induction. The Bishop score is simple and assesses preinduction cervical favorability based on five components. However, it has high inter- and intra-observer variability. Alternative objective methods are transvaginal ultrasound parameters (e.g., cervical length, width, and funneling). Objective To assess and compare the predictive value of transvaginal ultrasound and bishop score for vaginal delivery. In addition, the time interval from induction to delivery in women undergoing induction of labor. Method This prospective cross-sectional study included 342 pregnant women, in whom induction of labor was performed at 38-42 weeks of gestation. Cervical length, funneling, and width from transvaginal sonography and bishop scores by digital examination are assessed prior to induction in high-risk cases according to standard protocol. Result In our study, both transvaginal cervical length and bishop score showed similar predictors of successful labor induction, i.e., vaginal delivery. The ROC curve for cervical length showed an optimal cut-off value of ≤ 32 mm, corresponding to a sensitivity of 64.2% and a specificity of 60.0%, whereas the optimal cut-off value for Bishop score was ≥ 5, with a sensitivity of 65.1% and a specificity of 62.0%. However, cervical width and the presence of cervical funneling did not correlate. Both cervical length and Bishop score had a significant correlation as predictors of successful induction, with an OR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.96), an AOR of 0.96 (955 CI 0.9-0.99), and an OR of 1.41 (95% CI 1.2-1.6) and an AOR 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.5), respectively. Conclusion Cervical length and bishop score are both good and equally predict of successful induction of labor. KEY WORDS Bishop score, Cervical length measurement, Labor induction, Obstetric delivery
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/4169
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKathmandu University
dc.subjectBishop score
dc.subjectCervical length measurement
dc.subjectLabor induction
dc.subjectObstetric delivery
dc.titleAccuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Parameters and Bishop Score as Predictors of Successful Induction of Labor in Term High-Risk Pregnancy
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage209
oaire.citation.startPage202
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication0ac6b1c4-56bd-40d8-9827-11dcbc56b419
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0ac6b1c4-56bd-40d8-9827-11dcbc56b419
relation.isJournalOfPublicationa782b7ff-cf89-4178-ad1c-11ed89cfe1bd

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
202-209.pdf
Size:
887.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections