Article:
Comprehensive Analysis of Frozen Shoulder Management

creativeworkseries.issn1999-6217
dc.contributor.authorKarki, Anuj Jung
dc.contributor.authorAmatya, Shirish Prasad
dc.contributor.authorThakur, Jay Prakash
dc.contributor.authorBaral, Bidur Kumar
dc.contributor.authorPiya, Roshan
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-31T09:14:36Z
dc.date.available2026-08-31T09:14:36Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionAnuj Jung Karki Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, National Academy of Medical Sciences (NAMS), Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal Shirish Prasad Amatya Nepal Pain Care and Research Center, Kathmandu, Nepal Jay Prakash Thakur Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, National Academy of Medical Sciences (NAMS), Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal Bidur Kumar Baral Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, National Academy of Medical Sciences (NAMS), Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal Roshan Piya Nepal Pain Care and Research Center, Kathmandu, Nepal
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a painful and debilitating condition characterized by progressive stiffness and restricted shoulder movement. It primarily affects middle-aged individuals, with a higher prevalence in women and those with metabolic disorders such as diabetes and hypertension. While FS is self-limiting, lasting 1–3 years, timely medical management with physiotherapy and interventions can accelerate recovery. This study evaluates the demographic profile, comorbidities, and treatment outcomes of FS patients managed at a pain clinic over four years. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients with frozen shoulder during the painful phase, treated at Nepal Pain Care and Research Center (Oct 2020–Oct 2024). Conservative treatment included analgesics (NASIDs and Paracetamol), Duloxetine, and physiotherapy. Non-responders underwent ultrasound-guided hydrodistension with 5% dextrose, lignocaine, methylprednisolone, and suprascapular block. Outcomes were assessed based on pain reduction, shoulder mobility, and daily function. Results: All 112 patients with frozen shoulder were initially treated with conservative management. Out of these, 100 patients (89.3%) showed significant improvement. However, 12 patients (10.7%) did not respond well to conservative treatment and were therefore ultrasound-guided hydrodistension was done. Among them, 10 patients (83.3%) experienced noticeable improvement, while 2 patients (16.7%) reported reduced pain but no improvement in their range of motion. Conclusions: Conservative treatments proved effective in most cases (89.3%), while ultrasound-guided hydrodistension was beneficial for resistant cases (83.3%).
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i03.4714
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/7530
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNepal Health Research Council
dc.subjectFrozen shoulder
dc.subjectPhysiotherapy
dc.subjectHydrodistension
dc.titleComprehensive Analysis of Frozen Shoulder Management
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage510
oaire.citation.startPage506
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublicationef0e5e64-f8db-4300-afbb-e3b9226671a2
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryef0e5e64-f8db-4300-afbb-e3b9226671a2
relation.isJournalOfPublication40bd2739-8b19-447c-be60-723a1bdd1dcd

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
506-510.pdf
Size:
316.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections