Publication:
Critical Appraisal of the Curricula of MD Anesthesiology Programs in Nepal using Harden’s 10 Questions

creativeworkseries.issnISSN (Print) : 1993-2979 | ISSN (Online) : 1993-2987
dc.contributor.authorPaneru, Hem Raj
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Pankaj
dc.contributor.authorLamsal, Ritesh
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-03T09:44:10Z
dc.date.available2025-11-03T09:44:10Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionHem Raj Paneru Department of Critical Care Medicine, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal Author Pankaj Joshi Department of Anesthesiology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal Author Ritesh Lamsal Department of Anesthesiology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal Author
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Introduction Anesthesiology in Nepal is evolving beyond its traditional operating room role, increasingly encompassing critical care, pain management, and multidisciplinary support. As surgical and procedural services expand, there is a growing demand for anesthesiologists with advanced clinical, leadership, and research skills. Ensuring that MD Anesthesiology curricula are robust and contextually relevant is essential for meeting Nepal’s diverse healthcare needs. This study aimed to assess whether the curricula included the key principles as outlined in Harden’s 10-question framework. Methods This study critically evaluated the MD Anesthesiology curricula from major Nepalese institutions using Harden’s Ten Questions framework. Curricular documents were collected and analyzed independently by multiple reviewers. Results All programs follow a three-year structure with a mandatory thesis, but variability exists in curricular detail, organization, and emphasis on research or community-based components. Needs assessments and stakeholder engagement are generally absent. Educational objectives are broad but often lack focus on leadership and interprofessional skills. Teaching and assessment methods remain largely traditional, with limited use of active learning or competency-based approaches. Communication of curriculum details and educational environment standards also vary widely. Conclusion MD Anesthesiology curricula in Nepal require comprehensive reform. Implementing evidence-based needs assessments, modern educational strategies, and continuous quality improvement will better prepare graduates to meet the complex challenges of contemporary healthcare.
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.59779/jiomnepal.1406
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/3027
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University
dc.subjectAnesthesiology
dc.subjectcurriculum evaluation
dc.subjectHarden’s ten questions
dc.subjectmedical education
dc.titleCritical Appraisal of the Curricula of MD Anesthesiology Programs in Nepal using Harden’s 10 Questions
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage102
oaire.citation.startPage96
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication36785908-a57b-42f4-961a-9168ac067265
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery36785908-a57b-42f4-961a-9168ac067265
relation.isJournalOfPublicationa9ba45d9-ee33-4a6b-b1fc-6626b87eec6c

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
96-102.pdf
Size:
279.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections