Publication:
Influence of Ureteric Orifice Configuration on Effective Insertion of Ureteral Access Sheath during Flexible Ureteroscopy

creativeworkseries.issnISSN (Print) : 1993-2979 | ISSN (Online) : 1993-2987
dc.contributor.authorJha, Amit Kumar
dc.contributor.authorLuitel, Bhojraj
dc.contributor.authorChapagain, Suman
dc.contributor.authorPoudyal, Sujeet
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, Manish Man
dc.contributor.authorChalise, Pawan Raj
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-08T07:05:55Z
dc.date.available2026-02-08T07:05:55Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionAmit Kumar Jha, Bhojraj Luitel, Suman Chapagain, Sujeet Poudyal, Manish Man Pradhan, Pawan Raj Chalise Department of Urology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Introduction: Retrograde Intrarenal surgeries are facilitated by the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS) but it is not always possible to insert the sheath on the first attempt. The aim of the study was to determine the possible predictive factors enabling insertion of UAS during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing fURS/RIRS who were not pre-stented were studied and data collected. The study parameters were the demographics of the patients, characteristics of the stones, and perioperative data, including the ureteric orifice (UO) configuration over introductory guidewire. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect the possible predictors of successful UAS insertion. Results: In total, 78 patients who underwent primary fURS were included, with a mean age of 38.9±14.68 years and a male: female ratio of 2.25:1 with an average stone burden of 11.4 mm. There was successful primary insertion of UAS in 47(60.26%) patients. Out of them, 44 of the patients had rounded configuration of the ureteric orifice with a successful primary insertion of UAS in 17 (38%) patients whereas 30 (88%) patients had successful insertion in those with tented configuration of the ureteric orifice over a guidewire with a significant p value (<0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, a tent-shaped UO after guidewire insertion was the only significant predictor (OR:13.70 95% CI:3.76-50.10 with p-value<0.0001) for primary successful UAS insertion into virgin ureters. Conclusion: Patients with tent-shaped UOs after insertion of a guidewire were more likely to have an UAS insertion on the first attempt in a virgin ureter. Keywords: Flexible ureteroscopy; ureteric access sheath; ureteric orifice configuration; virgin ureters
dc.identifier10.59779/jiomnepal.1392
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/4584
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Medicine
dc.subjectFlexible ureteroscopy
dc.subjectureteric access sheath
dc.subjectureteric orifice configuration
dc.subjectvirgin ureters
dc.titleInfluence of Ureteric Orifice Configuration on Effective Insertion of Ureteral Access Sheath during Flexible Ureteroscopy
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage73
oaire.citation.startPage68
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublicatione04af5db-6c70-4293-86f9-09889a7974f3
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye04af5db-6c70-4293-86f9-09889a7974f3
relation.isJournalOfPublicationa9ba45d9-ee33-4a6b-b1fc-6626b87eec6c

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
68-73.pdf
Size:
547.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections