Publication:
Bear Maul Injury among Patients Presenting to the Department of Surgery in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

creativeworkseries.issnJNMA Print ISSN: 0028-2715; Online ISSN: 1815-672X
dc.contributor.authorMenyangbo, Suryaman
dc.contributor.authorBhatta, Gakul
dc.contributor.authorRokaya, Poojan Kumar
dc.contributor.authorBasnet, Rabin
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-28T08:09:01Z
dc.date.available2025-10-28T08:09:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionSuryaman Menyangbo Department of General Surgery, Karnali Academy of Health Sciences, Chandannath, Jumla, Nepal Gakul Bhatta Department of General Surgery, Karnali Academy of Health Sciences, Chandannath, Jumla, Nepal Poojan Kumar Rokaya Department of Orthopaedics, Karnali Academy of Health Sciences, Chandannath, Jumla, Nepal Rabin Basnet Department of Emergency, Bir Hospital, Kantipath, Kathmandu, Nepal
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction: Bears are robust and agile wild creatures that can potentially inflict injuries. Black bears (Ursus thibetanus) are an inhabitant of the mountainous part of Nepal. Encounters between humans and bears generally occur in the bear-prevalent areas of Nepal and the world inflicting complex categorical injuries. The aim of the study was to find the prevalence of bear maul injury among patients presenting to the Department of Surgery in a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was done in the Department of Surgery in a tertiary care centre from 1 August 2017 to 1 September 2022. Data was collected from the records of the Department of Surgery after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 078/79/38). The collected data included time of arrival in the hospital, type of bear, types of laceration, wound type, and demographic of patients. Convenience sampling method was used. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 2980 patients presenting to the Department of Surgery, the prevalence of bear maul injury was 15 (0.50%) (0.25-0.75, 95% Confidence Interval). Of which, all had laceration injury, with the face and scalp 9 (60%) being the highest injured site. Autumn was the season attacked most in daytime. Conclusions: The prevalence of bear maul injury was lower than in other studies done in similar settings.
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.7907
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/2852
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNepal Medical Association
dc.subjectBears
dc.subjectInjuries
dc.subjectLacerations
dc.subjectNepal
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.titleBear Maul Injury among Patients Presenting to the Department of Surgery in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage999
oaire.citation.startPage995
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublicationb3d66976-818d-4d3b-b872-93cdd5dcd0fb
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb3d66976-818d-4d3b-b872-93cdd5dcd0fb
relation.isJournalOfPublicatione6e146a0-0ece-4aba-aa0a-6ccfbd10a12a

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
995-999.pdf
Size:
240.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections