Publication: Non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy
| creativeworkseries.issn | 1812-2027 | |
| dc.contributor.author | BR, Sharma | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-03T05:53:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-03T05:53:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.description | BR Sharma Consultant Ophthalmologist and Chief Oculoplasty Unit, Lumbini Eye Institute, Siddharthanagar, Nepal, Associate Professor, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Aims and Objectives: To compare the success rates of non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy for the surgical management of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Materials and methods: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative interventional case series of 302 patients who underwent either endonasal or external dacryocystorhinostomy over a period of 2 years. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon and patients with primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction with a minimum of 6 months post operative follow up were included in the study. While external dacryocystorhinostomy was performed using traditional technique, endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy was performed using direct method of nonendoscopic visualization. Results: Of the 302 cases included in the study 165 patients had endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy whereas 137 underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy. Success was de ned by resolution of symptoms of tearing, a negative uorescein dye disappearance test and patency of the canalicular system on lacrimal irrigation. In the external dacryocystorhinostomy group 124 (90.5%) patients had surgical success whereas 146 (88.5%) of the endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy patients had successful outcome. The overall success rate was 89.4%, and the difference of surgical success between the two groups was not statistically signi cant ( P=0.57). Conclusion: Non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy gives surgical results comparable to those of external dacryocystorhinostomy and is a viable alternative where dacryocystorhinostomy is indicated for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Key words: Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy (ENDCR), External Dacryocystorhinostomy (EXDCR), Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANLDO) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/1149 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Kathmandu University | |
| dc.title | Non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.article.type | Original Article | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 442 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 437 | |
| relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication | 1fc39eac-2b30-4ac7-95e8-7bf6cb71abb9 | |
| relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 1fc39eac-2b30-4ac7-95e8-7bf6cb71abb9 | |
| relation.isJournalOfPublication | a782b7ff-cf89-4178-ad1c-11ed89cfe1bd |