Publication:
Outcomes of Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Renal and Ureteral Calculi

creativeworkseries.issn1812-2027
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, HN
dc.contributor.authorKarmacharya, RM
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, R
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, B
dc.contributor.authorde Jong, IJ
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, RKM
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-21T06:27:22Z
dc.date.available2025-09-21T06:27:22Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.descriptionJoshi HN,1 Karmacharya RM,1 Shrestha R,2 Shrestha B,1 de Jong IJ,3 Shrestha RKM1 1Department of Surgery 2Department of Pharmacology Dhulikhel Hospital- Kathmandu University Hospital Kathmandu University School of medical Science Dhulikhel Hospital, Kavre, Nepal 3Department of Urology University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Background Since the introduction in early 1980s, Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL) became the accepted first line treatment modality for renal and upper ureteric stones. It is simple, safe and effective noninvasive procedure which can be performed without anaesthesia in outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of ESWL to achieve complete stone clearance in the patients with different sizes of renal and upper ureteric stones. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the outcome, efficacy and complications of ESWL in the treatment for renal and ureteric stones in terms of the site and the size of the stone in the patients presented at Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital. Method In this prospective study a total of 430 (214 renal and 216 ureteric) cases of urinary stone disease in 257 male and 173 female patients treated by ESWL at Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital during time period of May 2010 to June 2012 were included. Data of patients with renal and ureteric stones were evaluated for stone site, size, and number of sessions. Data were analyzed using spss 13.0. Result Out of 430 cases, the overall stone free rate in after 1st session was 341 (79.3%) at one month and in three months follow up (3 sessions) it was increased up to 414 (96.3%). In 16 (3.7%) patients treatment was failed. Average size of the stone was 12.24 (SD± 3.65) mm. Stone free rate was 154 (72%) in the case of renal and 187 (86.6%) in the case of ureteric stones in first session. In three months follow up (three sessions) it was 204 (95.4%) and 210 (97.2%) respectively for renal and ureteric stones. In relation to size the stone free rate in <10mm, 10-15mm and > 15mm was 97%, 97% and 90%. Conclusion ESWL is the first line preferred choice for renal and upper ureteric stones which provides the maximum stone free rate in the case of stone size smaller than 1.5cm. KEY WORDS ESWL, outcome, renal stones, ureteric stones, urinary stone disease, urolithiasis
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/2244
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKathmandu University
dc.titleOutcomes of Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Renal and Ureteral Calculi
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage54
oaire.citation.startPage51
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication1dbf5f50-1c7c-4a3c-bad7-ec807df60584
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1dbf5f50-1c7c-4a3c-bad7-ec807df60584
relation.isJournalOfPublicationa782b7ff-cf89-4178-ad1c-11ed89cfe1bd

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
51-54.pdf
Size:
185.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections