Publication:
The Incidence of Adverse Reaction to Contrast Media in Computed Tomography Scan

creativeworkseries.issnISSN (Print) : 1993-2979 | ISSN (Online) : 1993-2987
dc.contributor.authorChand, RB
dc.contributor.authorMaharjan, S
dc.contributor.authorPant, DK
dc.contributor.authorPaudel, S
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-15T05:16:24Z
dc.date.available2026-05-15T05:16:24Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.descriptionRB Chand Department of Radiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal S Maharjan Department of Radiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal DK Pant Department of Radiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal S. Paudel Department of Radiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction: Iodinated contrast media is the most commonly used drug in diagnostic radiology. In the United States alone, more than 50 million Computed Tomography (CT) studies are performed annually and about 50% of CT studies use intravenous iodinated contrast media. The adverse reactions to intravenous iodinated contrast media range from a mild inconvenience, such as itching associated with hives to a life-threatening emergency. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of adverse reactions to intravenous non- ionic iodinated contrast media in contrast enhanced CT examinations. Methods: This quantitative, exploratory-descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in Department of Radiology and Imaging of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), Maharajgunj, Kathmandu. All the patients undergoing contrast enhanced computed tomographic examinations from 29th Jestha, 2068 to 30th Asar, 2068 (12th June 2011 and 14th July 2011) were documented for the incidence of adverse reactions. Contrast reactions were categorized as mild, moderate, or severe according to American College of Radiology Guidelines. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS soft ware. Results: A total 423 cases were undergone CT scan using non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media. Out of 423 cases, 17(4.01%) adverse reactions were type I (mild). Not a single case of type II (moderate) reaction and type III (severe) reaction was observed. Type I reactions were mainly characterized by nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness and rashes. Intensity of all events was light, with signs and symptoms receding spontaneously. Conclusion: Adverse reactions to intravenous administration of a non-ionic contrast media are fewer and mostly mild reactions. Thus the use of non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media is an appropriate strategy for minimizing adverse reactions. Keywords: contrast media, adverse reactions, intravenous, CT-scan
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.59779/jiomnepal.644
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/6092
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Medicine
dc.subjectcontrast media
dc.subjectadverse reactions
dc.subjectintravenous
dc.subjectCT-scan
dc.titleThe Incidence of Adverse Reaction to Contrast Media in Computed Tomography Scan
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage36
oaire.citation.startPage33
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublicatione6f96d43-7cad-4fa0-b6ab-c8622f4864eb
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye6f96d43-7cad-4fa0-b6ab-c8622f4864eb
relation.isJournalOfPublicationa9ba45d9-ee33-4a6b-b1fc-6626b87eec6c

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
33-36.pdf
Size:
85.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections