Publication:
Breathing comfort associated with different modes of ventilation: A comparative study in non-intubated healthy Nepalese volunteers

creativeworkseries.issn1812-2027
dc.contributor.authorPR, Baral
dc.contributor.authorB, Bhattarai
dc.contributor.authorR, Pande
dc.contributor.authorU, Bhadani
dc.contributor.authorA, Bhattacharya
dc.contributor.authorM, Tripathi
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T06:08:01Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T06:08:01Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.descriptionBaral PR 1, Bhattarai B2, Pande R 3, Bhadani U 4, Bhattacharya A 5, Tripathi M 6 1 Lecturer, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kathmandu University Medical School, B & B Teaching Hospital, 2,3,4Associate Professors, 5Professor, 6Additional Professor Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Dharan, Sunsari, Nepal.
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare subjective experience of comfort associated with various commonly used supportive modes of mechanical ventilation for weaning in the intensive care unit (ICU). Subjects and Methods: The study was carried out in general ICU of a community-based teaching hospital in 30 healthy adult Nepalese volunteers of either sex and 19-37 years of age. The subjects were randomly made to experience breathing via anatomical facemask through ventilator circuit with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), assisted spontaneous breathing (ASB), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP), and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) modes of ventilation with parameters set at intermediate level of respiratory support. Subjective comfort of breathing was noted using a 10cm visual analogue scale (VAS) with no discomfort at one end and maximum imaginable discomfort at the other. Inspiratory and expiratory experience of discomfort was also noted using a four point ranking scale (0-no discomfort, 1-mild discomfort, 2-moderate discomfort and 3-severe discomfort). In addition, presence or absence of feeling of breathlessness and inflation was also noted. Results: BiPAP was the most comfortable mode of ventilation (p<0.01) on visual analogue scale. SIMV and CPAP modes were associated with higher discomfort than other modes during inspiratory and expiratory phases respectively. Breathlessness and inflation were least felt in BiPAP and SIMV modes respectively. Conclusion: Perception of breathing comfort can vary widely with various supportive modes of ventilation in the ICU. Hence, no single supportive mode should be used in all patients during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Key words: assisted spontaneous breathing; biphasic positive airway pressure; breathing comfort; continuous positive airway pressure; mechanical ventilation; supportive modes synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation; weaning
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14572/797
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKathmandu University
dc.titleBreathing comfort associated with different modes of ventilation: A comparative study in non-intubated healthy Nepalese volunteers
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.typeOriginal Article
oaire.citation.endPage306
oaire.citation.startPage302
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublicationb6739cd4-932c-45b5-a023-f78fa897ee92
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb6739cd4-932c-45b5-a023-f78fa897ee92
relation.isJournalOfPublicationa782b7ff-cf89-4178-ad1c-11ed89cfe1bd

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
302-306.pdf
Size:
49.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections