Repository logo
Government of Nepal
NEPAL HEALTH RESEARCH COUNCIL
Repository logo
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
Government of Nepal
NEPAL HEALTH RESEARCH COUNCIL
Repository logo
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Shrestha, BR"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    A comparison of 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle with 26 gauge Eldor spinal needle for the elective Caesarian sections: Insertion characteristics and complications
    (Kathmandu University, 2003) Tabedar, S; Maharjan, SK; Shrestha, BR; Shrestha, BM
    Objective: The study was designed to compare the insertion characteristics and incidence of PDPH between 25 gauge Quincke needle and 26 gauge Eldor needle for spinal anaesthesia in elective c/s. Method: 60 pregnant women (aged 19-35yrs and weighing 58 –67kg) undergoing elective caesarean section were randomized into group A (Quincke spinal needle group) or group B (Eldor spinal needle group). Spinal anaesthesia was performed with 2.9 ml 0.5% heavy bupivacaine using 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle in group A and 26 Gauge Eldor spinal needle in group B. Onset, time of first identification of backflow of CSF, number of attempts, level of sensory and motor blockade, failure of anaesthesia, inadequate anaesthesia and incidence of PDPH were recorded. Result: Quincke spinal needle was found easy at insertion, first attempt was successful in 90% of cases, whereas Eldor spinal needle was successful at first attempt in only 60% of cases. Early identification of CSF was seen in Eldor spinal needle group in 3.5 seconds vs. 5.2 seconds in Quincke spinal needle group. Blood mixed CSF was seen in 8 Quincke spinal needle group vs. none in Eldor spinal needle group. Onset was similar between both groups i.e. in 6 minutes. Failure of anaesthesia was none in Eldor spinal needle group vs. 2 in quincke spinal needle group. Height of sensory block achieved was T4 level in 26 parturients,T6 in 1 ,T8 in 1 and no anaesthesia at all in another 2 parturient as compared to T4 level in 29 and T3 in 1 parturient in Eldor spinal needle group. The degree of motor block with the use of Bromage criteria showed a motor score of 1or 2 in 26 parturients in Quincke spinal needle group vs. same in all cases in Eldor spinal needle group. The total incidence of PDPH was 8.3 %( 5 out of 60 parturient) which occurred all in Quincke spinal needle group. 2 parturient who developed severe PDPH required epidural blood patch. Conclusion: 26 gauge Eldor spinal needle was found to be better than 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle for caesarian sections to decrease the incidence of PDPH, though not all insertion characteristics were in favour of the Eldor needle. Key Words: Anaesthetic technique, spinal; equipment, spinal needles; complications, headache.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    A comparison of haemodynamic responses with pethidine vs. butorphanol in open cholecystectomy cases
    (Kathmandu University, 2004) Tabedar, S; Maharjan, SK; Shrestha, BR; Shrestha, S
    Objective: The present study was undertaken to compare the haemodynamic responses with pethidine vs. Butorphanol intraoperatively in open cholecystectomy cases in KMCTH. Method: In this randomized study, all together 40 patients undergoing routine cholecystectomy surgery were included. Group A received Pethidine 1mg/kg and Group B received Butorphanol 0.04mg/kg intraoperatively. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded before injection of the drug, after injection, before intubation, after intubation, before skin incision, after incision, before extubation and after extubation Data analysis was done using independent sample “t” test. Result: Our study showed no statistical significance in haemodynamic responses with either pethidine or Butorphanol in open cholecystectomy cases. Conclusion: Both drugs appear equally good analgesics in our study. Key words: analgesics, pethidine, Butorphanol, haemodynamic responses, surgery, cholecystectomy.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Antiemetic prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting with ondansetron-dexamethasone combination compared to ondansetron or dexamethasone alone for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    (Kathmandu University, 2008) Gautam, B; Shrestha, BR; Lama, P; Rai, S
    Abstract Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common distressing experience in patients following laparoscopic surgeries. This study was aimed at comparing the ef cacies of Ondansetron-Dexamethasone combination with each drug alone as a prophylaxis against PONV in patients after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy done under general anaesthesia. Materials and methods: Hundred and fty ASA I and II patients, aged 23 to 65 yrs, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to receive one of three treatment regimens: 4 mg Ondansetron (Group O), 8 mg Dexamethasone (Group D) or 4 mg Ondansetron plus 8 mg Dexamethasone (Group OD) (n=50 for each). A standardized balanced general anaesthetic technique was employed. Any episode of PONV and need for rescue antiemetic were assessed at six, 12 and 24 hrs post operation. Complete response was de ned as no PONV in 24 hrs and need for rescue antiemetic was considered as failure of prophylaxis. Pain scores, time to rst analgesia demand, amount of Meperidine consumption, adverse event(s) and duration of hospital stay were recorded. Results: Complete response occurred in 66.7, 66.0 and 89.4% in Groups O, D and OD respectively. Rescue antiemetics were required in 29.2, 31.9 and 8.5% of patients in Groups O, D, and OD respectively. Signi cantly high incidence of vomiting and failure of prophylaxis (19.1%) occurred in group D during the rst six hrs (P=0.023 versus O & 0.008 versus OD). More frequent antiemetic rescue was required in group O at 6 to 24 hr interval as compared to group OD (P=0.032). Conclusion: Combination of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone is better than each drug alone in preventing PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dexamethasone alone is signi cantly less effective in preventing early vomiting compared to its combination with Ondansetron; whereas Ondansetron alone is less effective against late PONV as compared with combination therapy. Key words: Antiemetic prophylaxis; Dexamethasone; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Ondansetron; postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Cardiac arrest during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia: A study into four cases
    (Kathmandu University, 2009) Gautam, B; Shrestha, BR
    Abstract Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LapChole) has virtually superseded the more conventional open abdomen approach for the surgical treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. LapChole is however not a risk free procedure and serious, potentially fatal intra-operative complications can occur. Here we present case reports of four patients who suffered from intra-operative cardiac arrest during LapChole. All four recovered without residual morbidity and three of them underwent successful surgery in the same setting. No definite cause could be identified in any of the patients. We outline several possible mechanisms that could have been involved and discuss these events in face of published reports describing similar incidences. We infer that the creation of carbon-dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum was involved in the causation of the cardiac arrest because all four incidences occurred within minutes thereafter. Although rare, such complications can be fatal and are thus demanding to the anaesthesiologist. Key words: Anaesthetic complications; carbon-dioxide pneumoperitoneum (CP); cardiac arrest; general anaesthesia; laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Inter pleural catheter technique for perioperative pain management
    (Kathmandu University, 2003) Shrestha, BR; Tabadar, S; Maharjan, S; Amatya, SR
    NA.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Tramadol along with local anaesthetics in the penile block for the children undergoing circumcision
    (Kathmandu University, 2005) Shrestha, BR; Bista, B
    Objective: This study was to find out the total duration of postoperative analgesia following circumcision in children when Tramadol was used as an adjunct to local anaesthetics in penile block. Methods: Forty children of age 5 – 13 yrs, ASA I & II were enrolled in this study. Patients were premedicated with ketamine and atropine intramuscularly prior to separation from their parents and IV cannulation. Penile block was then performed under strict aseptic precautions with paramedian approach by 3cm long 23g ordinary needle where 4 ml of mixture of local anaesthetics and tramadol was given on each side of the base of penis at 11 and 2 o~ clock positions. Duration of analgesia was recorded from the time of completion of surgery till the patients’ first complain of pain and when additional analgesic was given. Intraoperative analgesia duration achieved by the penile block was not included in this study due to unavoidable overlapping of sedation and analgesia produced by the premedicated IM Ketamine (4-5 mg/kg) ,which lasts for 25 minutes to 30 minutes. Unless complicated, this is the usual surgery time in our hospital for this procedure. Because of this reason, the sedation score was not used in this study. Moreover, paediatric sedation score remains too impractical and unreliable in our context. Results: Addition of Tramadol with local anaesthetics in penile block prolonged the postoperative analgesia even up to 40hours. Conclusion: Tramadol as an adjunct with Local Anaesthetics extends the duration of postoperative analgesia and can be used safely for this purpose in the children. Key words: Penile Block, Circumcision, Tramadol, Postoperative Analgesia.

Connect with us

Nepal Health Research Council © 2023
Ramshah Path, Kathmandu Nepal P.O.Box 7626